Archive for the ‘Personal Injury-Liability’ Category

Florida House Subcommittee Passes PIP Reform Bill

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

The Florida House Civil Justice Subcommittee voted to pass CS/HB119 on Wednesday afternoon, moving Florida lawmakers one step closer to radically altering the rights of Florida residents who are involved in auto and other motor vehicle accidents. The bill is aimed at overhauling Florida drivers’ Personal Injury Protection insurance, also known as “PIP” or “no-fault insurance.”PIP reform insurance

Under the current law, every Florida auto insurance policy must include a minimum of $10,000 in PIP medical insurance coverage per person per accident.  The PIP benefits must be used to cover the driver’s (and passenger’s) medical bills first, regardless of whether or not the driver was at fault in the auto accident.

By contrast, the proposed House bill, which would go into effect on October 1, 2012 if passed, would impose an emergency care system, requiring drivers involved in auto accidents to receive emergency room treatment within 72 hours of the accident for their injuries.  Only those (a) transported by ambulance; (b) treated in a hospital by an MD, DO, dentist, ARNP or PA; or (c) admitted to the hospital would be eligible for the $10,000 in benefits.  The bill would not allow treatment by a chiropractor or licensed massage therapist.

Even supporters of this proposed legislation agree that such a drastic requirement would increase health care costs and further burden ER hospital staff who are already overwhelmed, not to mention it would also endanger the health of other ER patients by creating greater delays in treatment.  Moreover, those who suffer traumatic brain injuries and other forms of injuries frequently sustained in auto accidents may not develop symptoms of such serious, potentially life-threatening injuries for months or even years.  Further, the bill ignores the proven medical benefits of prompt chiropractic treatment in auto accident victims.

HB 119 would also impose numerous additional requirements for accident reports, provide coverage limits, establish a schedule of maximum charges, create a list of diagnostic tests deemed not to be medically necessary, and control attorneys’ fees.  It would also allow expanded “examinations under oath” by insurance companies, which are already intimidating and intrusive to auto insurance policy holders.  Florida Governor Rick Scott expressed his support for the bill at a news conference yesterday.

The bill is currently before the House Economic Affairs Committee.  Meanwhile, the Florida Senate also has its own version of a PIP reform bill, SB1860, which does not cap attorneys’ fees but requires long-form accident reports and additional licensing of clinics to address fraud, along with calling for a statewide task force.

Florida lawmakers’ stated rationale for imposing such radical no-fault insurance reform is to curb insurance fraud throughout the state.  It is unclear, however, how the measures proposed in the House and Senate bills would reduce fraudulent claims.  What’s worse, unless the legislation considers the potentially disastrous consequences of radical PIP reform and blindly acquiesces to mounting pressures by insurance lobbyists, the new law will leave thousands of Florida drivers with serious injuries–many of whom already lack health insurance–in the dust.

The attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have over 70 years of combined experience in settling auto and other accident cases, together with the resources to take a case through trial and a jury verdict in the appropriate circumstances. We have tried dozens of cases throughout Florida, including Pinellas, Hillsborough, and Pasco Counties, and you can count on us to fight to resolve your case for what it’s worth.

Florida PIRG Report Identifies Toys to Avoid This Holiday Season

Monday, December 12th, 2011

It may have been the subject of a 1976 “Saturday Night Live” comedy skit in which Dan Aykroyd portrayed fictitious toy manufacturer Irwin Mainway defending such “harmless playthings” as “Bag O’ Glass,” “Johnny Switchblade,” and “Teddy Chainsaw Bear,” but the hazards of some toys that may find their way under your tree this holiday season can be serious—even fatal.

On November 22, 2011, the Florida Public Interest Group (“PIRG”) released its 26th annual “Troubles in Toyland” report on dangerous toys.  Among other dangerous propensities, the PIRG report identifies toys containing lead, noting that a number of toys found in stores exceed the strict limits (300ppm) on lead amounts imposed by Congress in 2008. According to the report, lead and phthalates have been linked to developmental delays in young children. Toys found to potentially toxic include Hello Kitty eyeshadow, a Honda toy motorcycle, and a Disney Tinkerbell watch.

Additionally, toys with small parts, particularly balls and balloons, are a leading cause of toy-related injuries, the PIRG press release. These include a set of wooden blocks by Timeless Toys, Sesame Street Oscar doll, and a Dinosaur Multi-Pack. Noisy toys, such as the Elmo Talking Cell Phone and Hot Wheels Super Stunt RAT BOMB, were also flagged as a major cause of hearing loss in children.

The PIRG report also makes recommendations for Congress and toy manufacturer for greater regulation and compliance with toy safety standards in the United States.

The child injury attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have more than 60 years of combined experience in helping children, parents, and families in the Tampa Bay, Florida area recover damages for injuries to children when others have needlessly placed them in harm’s way. If you are in need of a personal injury and accident lawyer, contact PERENICH The Law Firm today to speak to one of our injury attorneys . Our offices are conveniently located in Clearwater, St. Petersburg, Tampa, Tarpon Springs, and Trinity, Florida.

Florida Laws Protect Children from Power Line Towers and Other Attractive Nuisances

Friday, September 9th, 2011

Like most states, Florida has numerous laws designed to protect children under the age of 18 from many common risks of harm, including personal injury. The reasoning behind such laws is that children have a lesser capacity to appreciate certain dangers and risks than adults; therefore, the government should have legislation and policies in place to protect them.

Among such protective legal measures concerning child safety is the “Attractive Nuisance Doctrine.” This doctrine is applied in the context of personal injuries to children as a result of a property owner’s negligent failure to warn, repair, or properly maintain the premises to prevent foreseeable harm to minors.

One tragic example of how this doctrine is applied in court involves the pending personal action lawsuit of Avi Davidson.  According to the St. Petersburg Times, in 2009, the Gaither High School student, who was 16 at the time, climbed a 35-foot power pole to take photographs and was thrown to the ground when he came in contact with a power line.  The teen suffered severe burns, lost his left arm from the elbow down, and was paralyzed below the waist.  The lawsuit alleges that Tampa Electric Co. was negligent for failing to warn people such as Avi Davidson of the dangers of power lines as well as failing to prevent access to the pole.

The child injury attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have more than 60 years of combined experience in helping children, parents, and families in the Tampa Bay, Florida area recover damages for injuries to children when others have needlessly placed them in harm’s way. If you are in need of a personal injury and accident lawyer, contact PERENICH The Law Firm today to speak to one of our injury attorneys . Our offices are conveniently located in Clearwater, St. Petersburg, Tampa, Tarpon Springs, and Trinity, Florida.

Florida’s New Pill Mill Law may be Difficult to Swallow

Wednesday, August 17th, 2011

Sometimes, the best-intended laws have unanticipated consequences.  Consider Florida’s new legislation aimed at grinding down prescription drug abuse, which is responsible for the deaths of 7 Floridians every day on average, according to the St. Petersburg Times.  Last year, then-governor Charlie Crist also approved legislation imposing stricter regulation on doctors and pain management clinics in Florida that prescribe and dispense prescription pain medication.

The new “Pill Mill Law” signed by current Florida governor Rick Scott, which went into effect on July 1, 2011, “tightens reporting requirements to the database from 15 days to seven days, a change critics said the program needed to make it more effective.”  In addition, the new prescription drug law “increases penalties for overprescribing Oxycodone and other narcotics, tracks wholesale distribution of some controlled substances, and provides $3 million to support law enforcement efforts and state prosecutors.”  Further, the legislation “prohibits most doctors who prescribe narcotics from dispensing them, requiring prescriptions to be filled at certain types of pharmacies.”

Rick Scott actually opposed the bill initially before having a change of heart.  The St. Pete Times reported that “of all the oxycodone that is dispensed by physicians in the United States, 85 percent is dispensed by Florida doctors.”

Despite the Pill Mill Law’s lofty intentions, it is not without its problems, and implementing this and previous pill mill laws is proving difficult.  For example, one of the law’s requirements was that prescriptions be written on special, counterfeit-proof pads.  This proved unduly burdensome for doctors who were unable to obtain the requisite prescription pads in time to assist patients who genuinely needed pain medication.

In addition, Florida government has been calling for the creation of a drug monitoring program since 2009, but this has yet to occur.  Finally, the new law and its predecessors have the effect of punishing those whom the laws are designed to protect through severe punishment of pharmaceutical drug offenses, which includes a minimum prison sentence of 3 years and $50,000 fines.

Frequently, persons injured in auto accidents, slip and fall, and other incidents have the misfortune of becoming addicted to painkillers as a result of their injuries, which are often caused by the negligence of others.  The accident and injury attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm can help clients receive the medical care they need from qualified doctors.

Florida “Keep Your Eyes on the Kids” Program Helps Prevent Drowning

Tuesday, July 26th, 2011

During the now infamous Casey Anthony trial, the defense alleged that her daughter Caylee Anthony had drowned in the family swimming pool.  In a state where drowning is the leading cause of death among toddlers, the odds were in their favor.

Tragically, Florida consistently has the highest unintentional drowning rate for children between the ages of 1 and 4.  Such drownings usually occur in swimming pools and beaches, where inattentive parents, caregivers, or lifeguards are negligent in supervising children in the water.  Even plastic kiddie pools and bathtubs can be deadly if children are left unattended.

During this unusually hot Florida summer, people are flocking to public and private pools as well as beaches to seek respite from the scorching temperatures.  Thus, the risk of accidental drowning is significant in crowded conditions, where it becomes far more difficult to watch children in the water.

In an effort to raise awareness and prevent accidental drownings, the Florida Office of Injury Prevention began a public outreach campaign in 2006 called “Keep Your Eyes on the Kids.”  The program has been implemented in Orange County and several other counties in Florida where the rate of accidental drownings is particularly high.  By 2009, the program had helped reduce the number of children ages 1 to 4 who drowned by15% and the drowning rate by 18%.

At Perenich The Law Firm, our drowning accident attorneys have more than 60 years of combined experience in holding those responsible for the unimaginable, tragic, and highly preventable death of a child due to drowning.  Our offices are conveniently located throughout the Tampa Bay, Florida area, including Clearwater,  St. Petersburg, Tampa, Tarpon Springs, and New Port Richey.

Good Faith/Bad Faith: Insurance Companies’ Settlement Responsibilities

Monday, June 6th, 2011

Under Florida law, the term “negligence” refers to an array of legal theories under which private parties may sue for injuries and monetary damages resulting from automobile, motorcycle, ATV, and boating accidents, slip and fall accidents, and wrongful death resulting from an accident or medical malpractice, among others.

Typically, the insurance company for the party who caused the accident and resulting injuries handles the claim. If the insurance company does not offer to settle for a reasonable amount, the attorney for the injured party may initiate a lawsuit. However, insurance companies are required by Florida law to attempt to settle injury claims in good faith.

In fact, the attorney for the injured party may initiate a separate lawsuit against the insurance company for its bad faith refusal to settle a case.  Recent attempts by the Florida legislature to set limits and impose higher restrictions on bad faith claims against insurance companies were thwarted earlier this year when HB 1187 stalled in the Florida House.

While the overwhelming majority of all civil lawsuits filed – around 98% – settle out of court, in some cases, it makes sense to go to trial and let the judge or jury decide. For example, in a case involving a client who suffered serious, permanent injuries in an auto accident, if the insurance company refuses to make a reasonable settlement offer, the case should proceed to trial so that we may try to maximize the client’s chances of a fair recovery instead of settling for a trivial amount.

The attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have over 70 years of combined experience in settling auto and other accident cases, together with the resources to take a case through trial and a jury verdict in the appropriate circumstances. We have tried dozens of cases throughout Florida, including Pinellas, Hillsborough, and Pasco Counties, and you can count on us to fight to resolve your case for what it’s worth.

Gov. Rick Scott Relaxes Security at Florida Ports

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011

Florida Governor Rick Scott has signed a bill that reduces security measures at seaports throughout the state by eliminating separate state background checks for port employees. In doing so, Scott has put the safety of Florida residents behind the financial interests of Big Business at a nominal cost savings (up to $3 million, according to Scott).

Safeguarding Florida’s coasts should be of paramount importance to our legislators.  Our ports are particularly vulnerable to criminal activity and terrorist attacks, which is why secondary measures to ensure proper and adequate screening of prospective port employees were put in place.

Now that HB283 has been signed into law, individuals seeking employment at any Florida seaport will only be subject to a background check by the federal government.  When employees who would otherwise be denied employment under the additional state screening wind up working at a port, where adequate, non-negligent hiring and supervision are critical to the safety and well-being of Florida residents,  members of the public will be able to hold Big Business and the state accountable for their negligence in the event of a criminal attack or other criminal activity.

The injury and negligence attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have over 70 years of combined experience in litigating and settling lawsuits based on injuries and harm caused by negligent hiring, negligent entrustment, and negligent security practices as a result of a criminal attack or other wrongful act.

Supreme Court Rules That Federal Auto Safety Standards Do Not Bar State Court Lawsuits

Friday, February 25th, 2011

Despite its disappointing ruling on vaccine-related lawsuits earlier this week, the Supreme Court just decided another personal injury case that marks a significant victory for victims of negligently designed or manufactured automobiles.

In Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., a unanimous Court held that state tort remedies are not preempted by federal minimum safety standards.  The Court found that lower courts had expanded such preemption too far in barring state law remedies for dangerous products. 

In Williamson, the victim was killed in a head-on collision because the rear center seat in the minivan she was riding in only had a lap-type seat belt rather than the safer lap/shoulder belt.  The state trial court dismissed the family’s product liability lawsuit against Mazda on the ground that it was preempted by federal motor vehicle safety standards, which allowed automakers the option of installing lap or lap/shoulder belts in the non-window position.  After the state appeals court affirmed the trial court’s decision to dismiss the case, the Supreme Court held that the regulation at issue only established a “minimum standard” and allowed a “continued meaningful role for state tort law.”

This decision will have a significant effect on millions of drivers throughout the country, including Florida residents involved in auto accidents, because over a million vehicles with this type of lap belt are still on the road.  In addition, this decision will likely be used to limit preemption of other minimum federal safety standards in future state court product safety lawsuits.

Keyless Cars May be Fatal

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

This morning’s broadcast of the “Today” show provided a grim reminder of the potential health hazards and personal injury risks in cars with keyless ignitions.  The show discussed the recent deaths of two Florida residents and a New York man in the past year from carbon monoxide poisoning when their keyless ignition vehicles, including a 2008 Lexus, remained running in their garages.  A fourth person suffered permanent brain damage.  A personal injury lawsuit has been filed in the New York case against Toyota, which owns Lexus.  More…

NJ Supreme Court Deals Blow to Premises Safety

Friday, August 6th, 2010

A ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court has dealt a blow to consumer rights and safety expectations of the residents of the state. A 5-2 decision handed down yesterday cleared a New Jersey health club from liability in a case regarding the injury of one of its members. Bob Considine of the New Jersey Star-Ledger has these details:

In the case of Stelluti v. Casapenn Enterprises, Gina Stelluti purchased a gym membership at the Powerhouse Gym at 8:30 a.m. on Jan. 13, 2004, and was injured less than an hour later while using a stationary bicycle in a spin class.

Stelluti, of Seaside Heights, claimed the bike’s adjustable handlebars dislodged as she was instructed to stand on the pedals. Stelluti’s feet remained strapped into the pedals as she fell forward, causing her to suffer chronic neck and back pain, as well as a cracked tooth, according to court papers.

Stelluti sued Powerhouse for negligence.

The defense argued Stelluti was bound by the agreement — or the Powerhouse Waiver and Release Form — she signed before joining the gym. Among the many conditions of the form was release of liability by the club for “the sudden and unforeseen malfunctioning of any equipment.”

By allowing the gym to excuse itself from liability regarding the safety of its patrons, the New Jersey Supreme Court has made the regular task of exercising a dangerous and potentially costly activity for thousands of gym members across New Jersey. The “Waiver and Release” forms that were used by Powerhouse and many other gyms provide protection for the businesses from a wide swath of potential safety hazards, including injuries that result as a result of “general negligence”, which includes harm caused by faulty or unchecked equipment and environmental hazards such as slippery floors.

When businesses and corporations are allowed to seek profits without expending due diligence protecting their consumers, a dangerous lapse in our society’s protections occurs. At PERENICH The Law Firm, we fight for the citizens of our country that have been the victims of negligence and wrongdoing at the hands of companies that placed profits over safety. As your Tampa Bay premises liability lawyers, we can help you heal from injuries and pain that resulted from businesses not making safety their number one priority.