Archive for the ‘IMPORTANT NOTICES’ Category

Florida House Subcommittee Passes PIP Reform Bill

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

The Florida House Civil Justice Subcommittee voted to pass CS/HB119 on Wednesday afternoon, moving Florida lawmakers one step closer to radically altering the rights of Florida residents who are involved in auto and other motor vehicle accidents. The bill is aimed at overhauling Florida drivers’ Personal Injury Protection insurance, also known as “PIP” or “no-fault insurance.”PIP reform insurance

Under the current law, every Florida auto insurance policy must include a minimum of $10,000 in PIP medical insurance coverage per person per accident.  The PIP benefits must be used to cover the driver’s (and passenger’s) medical bills first, regardless of whether or not the driver was at fault in the auto accident.

By contrast, the proposed House bill, which would go into effect on October 1, 2012 if passed, would impose an emergency care system, requiring drivers involved in auto accidents to receive emergency room treatment within 72 hours of the accident for their injuries.  Only those (a) transported by ambulance; (b) treated in a hospital by an MD, DO, dentist, ARNP or PA; or (c) admitted to the hospital would be eligible for the $10,000 in benefits.  The bill would not allow treatment by a chiropractor or licensed massage therapist.

Even supporters of this proposed legislation agree that such a drastic requirement would increase health care costs and further burden ER hospital staff who are already overwhelmed, not to mention it would also endanger the health of other ER patients by creating greater delays in treatment.  Moreover, those who suffer traumatic brain injuries and other forms of injuries frequently sustained in auto accidents may not develop symptoms of such serious, potentially life-threatening injuries for months or even years.  Further, the bill ignores the proven medical benefits of prompt chiropractic treatment in auto accident victims.

HB 119 would also impose numerous additional requirements for accident reports, provide coverage limits, establish a schedule of maximum charges, create a list of diagnostic tests deemed not to be medically necessary, and control attorneys’ fees.  It would also allow expanded “examinations under oath” by insurance companies, which are already intimidating and intrusive to auto insurance policy holders.  Florida Governor Rick Scott expressed his support for the bill at a news conference yesterday.

The bill is currently before the House Economic Affairs Committee.  Meanwhile, the Florida Senate also has its own version of a PIP reform bill, SB1860, which does not cap attorneys’ fees but requires long-form accident reports and additional licensing of clinics to address fraud, along with calling for a statewide task force.

Florida lawmakers’ stated rationale for imposing such radical no-fault insurance reform is to curb insurance fraud throughout the state.  It is unclear, however, how the measures proposed in the House and Senate bills would reduce fraudulent claims.  What’s worse, unless the legislation considers the potentially disastrous consequences of radical PIP reform and blindly acquiesces to mounting pressures by insurance lobbyists, the new law will leave thousands of Florida drivers with serious injuries–many of whom already lack health insurance–in the dust.

The attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have over 70 years of combined experience in settling auto and other accident cases, together with the resources to take a case through trial and a jury verdict in the appropriate circumstances. We have tried dozens of cases throughout Florida, including Pinellas, Hillsborough, and Pasco Counties, and you can count on us to fight to resolve your case for what it’s worth.

Florida PIRG Report Identifies Toys to Avoid This Holiday Season

Monday, December 12th, 2011

It may have been the subject of a 1976 “Saturday Night Live” comedy skit in which Dan Aykroyd portrayed fictitious toy manufacturer Irwin Mainway defending such “harmless playthings” as “Bag O’ Glass,” “Johnny Switchblade,” and “Teddy Chainsaw Bear,” but the hazards of some toys that may find their way under your tree this holiday season can be serious—even fatal.

On November 22, 2011, the Florida Public Interest Group (“PIRG”) released its 26th annual “Troubles in Toyland” report on dangerous toys.  Among other dangerous propensities, the PIRG report identifies toys containing lead, noting that a number of toys found in stores exceed the strict limits (300ppm) on lead amounts imposed by Congress in 2008. According to the report, lead and phthalates have been linked to developmental delays in young children. Toys found to potentially toxic include Hello Kitty eyeshadow, a Honda toy motorcycle, and a Disney Tinkerbell watch.

Additionally, toys with small parts, particularly balls and balloons, are a leading cause of toy-related injuries, the PIRG press release. These include a set of wooden blocks by Timeless Toys, Sesame Street Oscar doll, and a Dinosaur Multi-Pack. Noisy toys, such as the Elmo Talking Cell Phone and Hot Wheels Super Stunt RAT BOMB, were also flagged as a major cause of hearing loss in children.

The PIRG report also makes recommendations for Congress and toy manufacturer for greater regulation and compliance with toy safety standards in the United States.

The child injury attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have more than 60 years of combined experience in helping children, parents, and families in the Tampa Bay, Florida area recover damages for injuries to children when others have needlessly placed them in harm’s way. If you are in need of a personal injury and accident lawyer, contact PERENICH The Law Firm today to speak to one of our injury attorneys . Our offices are conveniently located in Clearwater, St. Petersburg, Tampa, Tarpon Springs, and Trinity, Florida.

Supreme Court Rules That Federal Auto Safety Standards Do Not Bar State Court Lawsuits

Friday, February 25th, 2011

Despite its disappointing ruling on vaccine-related lawsuits earlier this week, the Supreme Court just decided another personal injury case that marks a significant victory for victims of negligently designed or manufactured automobiles.

In Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., a unanimous Court held that state tort remedies are not preempted by federal minimum safety standards.  The Court found that lower courts had expanded such preemption too far in barring state law remedies for dangerous products. 

In Williamson, the victim was killed in a head-on collision because the rear center seat in the minivan she was riding in only had a lap-type seat belt rather than the safer lap/shoulder belt.  The state trial court dismissed the family’s product liability lawsuit against Mazda on the ground that it was preempted by federal motor vehicle safety standards, which allowed automakers the option of installing lap or lap/shoulder belts in the non-window position.  After the state appeals court affirmed the trial court’s decision to dismiss the case, the Supreme Court held that the regulation at issue only established a “minimum standard” and allowed a “continued meaningful role for state tort law.”

This decision will have a significant effect on millions of drivers throughout the country, including Florida residents involved in auto accidents, because over a million vehicles with this type of lap belt are still on the road.  In addition, this decision will likely be used to limit preemption of other minimum federal safety standards in future state court product safety lawsuits.

PERENICH The Law Firm Has a New Home

Monday, February 21st, 2011

PERENICH officeAfter months of renovation, PERENICH The Law Firm’s Clearwater office has settled into its new location at 25749 US Hwy 19, between Dimmit Chevrolet and the Cypress Point shopping center, which houses Burlington Coat Factory, Fresh Market, and Jason’s Deli. Formerly Wachovia Bank, PERENICH The Law Firm’s offices are on the second floor, with commercial office space available on the first floor.

This is an exciting move for the firm, which continues to serve clients in the areas of consumer law and litigation, including personal injury, medical malpractice, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, and mortgage loan modification.

Keyless Cars May be Fatal

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

This morning’s broadcast of the “Today” show provided a grim reminder of the potential health hazards and personal injury risks in cars with keyless ignitions.  The show discussed the recent deaths of two Florida residents and a New York man in the past year from carbon monoxide poisoning when their keyless ignition vehicles, including a 2008 Lexus, remained running in their garages.  A fourth person suffered permanent brain damage.  A personal injury lawsuit has been filed in the New York case against Toyota, which owns Lexus.  More…

Florida House Bill 971 Signed Into Law, Endangers Bicyclists

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

The Florida Legislature and Governor Crist recently passed and signed, respectively, a new Florida law that mandates bicyclists to use designated bike lanes except for extremely specified exceptions. While it is usually advisable to use the bike lanes that are provided, there are many instances where the bike lanes become less safe than the travel lanes that cars use. The new Florida law imperils active cyclists and other bicycle commuters throughout our Tampa Bay area because they are misled into believing that the duty to bicyclists to stay in dedicated bike lanes relieves motorists of the duty to be aware of cyclists who do not use the bike lanes, even when conditions require bicyclists to travel out of their bike lanes.

Florida House Bill 971 does not make the roads safer for bicyclists. By mandating that bike riders must ride in available bike lanes, with very few and specific exceptions, it drastically limits the rights that cyclists have as legal vehicles on the road. Partially informed motorists may begin to think that this law strips bicyclists of all rights to the road, and it is feared that driver aggression towards bike riders who use the road could escalate.   While the law provides that cyclists have the right to travel out of dedicated bike lanes where the surface conditions are unsafe, these “conditions” are rarely evident to motorists.  As such, motorists will always presume that where there are dedicated bike lanes, that the surface conditions are safe and the bicyclists have no right to use the other portions of the roadways.

This law discourages many from making the transition from commuting by car to a healthier commute by bike. The fear of being accused of breaking the law when avoiding unsafe bike lanes may keep many would-be cyclists from mounting their bikes. There are many roads that have been converted to include bike lanes next to narrowed travel lanes. Before this law, a cyclist had the option of using the bike lane, or “commanding” (driving as a car would) a travel lane. Many cyclists felt such narrow lanes put them at risk, and now mandatory decrees that they must use the bike lane can either put them in harm’s way or discourage them from biking.

Some roads have striped spaces to the right of a travel lane that appear to be bike lanes, but the truth is that they are too narrow to carry the legal designation. These unmarked shoulders are by no measure safe to use as a bike lane, but motorists may harass cyclists who refuse to use the lane under the misguided notion that the shoulder constitutes as such a bike lane. It is claimed that the law actually champions bike riders’ rights by encouraging the proliferation of even more bike lanes, but in actuality it takes away the legal right to the road the cyclists have enjoyed and places countless lives at risk.

If you are a cyclist who has been hit by a negligent motorist, they may claim that you are ultimately responsible due to this new law. We strongly advise you to contact a bike accident lawyer to find out what your rights are. At Perenich The Law Firm, we fight for the right of cyclists under the banner of “Share the Road”, and we believe that this particular aspect of Florida HB 971 is misguided and life-threatening to the cyclist community. As your Tampa Bay bike accident attorneys, we represent you and your loved ones when others fail to respect the rightful place of bicyclists in our community.

Two Recalls Issued that Could Affect Your Family

Friday, June 4th, 2010

Yesterday (June 3rd) two major recalls were issued by manufacturers that may affect you, your house, or your children. We here at Perenich The Law Firm want to make sure that you are kept aware of potential safety risks so that you may take the appropriate measures to remove the potentially dangerous objects.

A Dishwasher

© Özgür Donmaz

Maytag issued a recall of 1.7 million dishwashers it has produced over the last 4 years. It has received 12 reports that there have been electrical failures in the heating element of their machines, and has led to fires and damages in consumers’ homes. The Associated Press published this description of the machines affected:

The recall includes Maytag, Amana, Jenn-Air, Admiral, Magic Chef, Performa by Maytag and Crosley brand dishwashers with plastic tubs. The recalled dishwashers were made with black, bisque, white, silver and stainless steel front panels and sold at department and appliance stores nationwide from February 2006 through April 2010. They cost between $250 and $900.

A complete list of the models and serial numbers affected can be found at this website.

McDonald’s has issued a recall of their own regarding the popular “Shrek”-themed glasses that they have been selling to promote the recently released movie. The glasses were found to contain small amounts of Cadmium, a known carcinogen, in the paint on the sides. Over 12 million of the glasses have been produced and sold, and Justin Pritchard of the Associated Press has this report on the potential dangers of the paint:

The (U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission) noted in its recall notice that “long-term exposure to cadmium can cause adverse health effects.” Cadmium is a known carcinogen that research shows also can cause bone softening and severe kidney problems.

In the case of the Shrek-themed glassware, the potential danger would be long-term exposure to low levels of cadmium, which could leach from the paint onto a child’s hand, then enter the body if the child puts that unwashed hand to his or her mouth.

Please check your household for such items and take the appropriate steps listed by the companies to turn in the products. Product safety is a continuing issue that should always be monitored, and our skilled team of Tampa Bay personal injury lawyers at Perenich The Law Firm can assist you in instances where a defective product has injured you or hurt one of your loved ones.

UPDATE (6/11): McDonald’s is now offering a $3 rebate for glasses that are returned to their stores. See additional details here.

Congress Looks to Ban “Drop-Side” Cribs

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Congress is moving toward banning “drop-side” cribs, which have been identified over the last decade as potentially life threatening devices and have been blamed for the deaths of 32 children and infants over the past ten years. The Associated Press’ Jennifer C. Kerr supplies these details:

[A]t least 32 infants and toddlers since 2000 (have) suffocated or were strangled in a drop-side crib, which has a side that moves up and down to allow parents to lift children from the cribs more easily than cribs with fixed sides. Drop-sides, around for decades and probably slept in by many of today’s parents, are suspected in an additional 14 infant fatalities during that time.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission, which regulates cribs, has warned about the problem. Its chairman, Inez Tenenbaum, has pledged to ban the manufacture and sale of cribs by the end of the year with a new performance standard that would make fixed-side cribs mandatory. It could be several months into 2011 before becoming effective.

If you or a family member currently uses a drop-side crib for one of your loved ones, we here at Perenich The Law Firm advise that you immediately look to find a different style crib, such as the fixed-side design, in order to prevent further tragedies from occurring. As your Clearwater and Tampa Bay Personal Injury attorneys, we have seen too many of these sad tragedies that affect the loved ones of others, and we hope that by spreading this important information, we may avoid future heartbreaks.

IMPORTANT: Changes in FL Law Impact Waivers for Your Child

Friday, May 21st, 2010

A recent Florida Supreme Court decision and a newly passed bill from the Florida Legislature have altered the use of pre-injury releases (usually known as waivers) that many commercial establishments make parents of minor children sign. It is important that you, as a parent of a minor child, know your rights when presented with such a form.

The ruling and new statutes now say that liability waivers for commercial establishments for minor children signed by their parent may only cover injuries resulting from the inherent risks of the activity. Inherent Risk is defined within the bill as:

“[T]hose dangers or conditions, known or unknown, which are characteristic of, intrinsic to, or an integral part of the activity and which are not eliminated even if the activity provider acts with due care in a reasonably prudent manner.”

This new legislation does not include negligence or misconduct on behalf of the commercial establishment and its staff as provisions that may be included and enforced in these waivers. All commercial parent/minor child waivers must have the following paragraph included in a font larger than and clearly distinguishable from the rest of the text of the waiver:

“NOTICE TO THE MINOR CHILD’S NATURAL GURADIAN

READ THIS FORM COMPLETELY AND CAREFULLY. YOU ARE AGREEING TO LET YOUR MINOR CHILD ENGAGE IN A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS ACTIVITY. YOU ARE AGREEING THAT, EVEN IF (…name of release party or parties…) USES REASONABLE CARE IN PROVIDING THIS ACTIVITY, THERE IS A CHANCE YOUR CHILD MAY BE SERIOUSLY INJURED OR KILLED BY PARTICIPATING IN THIS ACTIVITY BECAUSE THERE ARE CERTAIN DANGERS INHERENT IN THE ACTIVITY WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED OR ELIMINATED. BY SIGNING THIS FORM YOU ARE GIVING UP YOUR CHILD’S RIGHT AND YOUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM (…name of released party or parties…) IN A LAWSUIT FOR ANY PERSONAL INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO YOUR CHILD OR ANY PROPERTY DAMAGE THAT RESULTS FROM THE RISKS THAT ARE A NATURAL PART OF THE ACTIVITY. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TO SIGN THIS FORM, AND (…name of released party or parties…) HAS THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TO LET YOUR CHILD PARTICIPATE IF YOU DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM.”

If the waiver only covers the inherent risks as described above, it is valid and enforceable, but if negligence and misconduct are also included, you still have the right to hold the commercial entity responsible for injuries arising from those actions.

This ruling and law only apply to commercial establishments. Waivers given by non-profit, community, or volunteer-run establishments may still use waivers that cover negligence and misconduct. Be sure to look over any and all forms that you are given before your child participates in any activity that could result in injury in death.

At Perenich The Law Firm, our goal is to educate our clients to evolving laws and legislation that can impact their everyday life. Make sure to always read over any type of legal form such as a liability waiver carefully, and if in doubt, contact one of our Personal Injury attorneys here in Clearwater. We serve the Tampa Bay area, and we will assist you in navigating the murky depths which surround these legal documents.