This morning’s broadcast of the “Today” show provided a grim reminder of the potential health hazards and personal
injury risks in cars with keyless ignitions. The show discussed the recent deaths of two Florida residents and a New York man in the past year from carbon monoxide poisoning when their keyless ignition vehicles, including a 2008 Lexus, remained running in their garages. A fourth person suffered permanent brain damage. A personal injury lawsuit has been filed in the New York case against Toyota, which owns Lexus. More…
Archive for the ‘Auto Accidents’ Category
Keyless Cars May be Fatal
Thursday, February 17th, 2011Rental Car Companies Put Consumers at Risk
Thursday, August 12th, 2010Over the years, we have seen a somewhat continuous stream of safety recalls regarding cars issued to the public. Most of the recalls come after many serious injuries have occurred, but are still important in eliminating the cause of potentially dangerous malfunctions within the car. Although for most consumers it is a logical reaction to bring in a car to be fixed if a recall is issued for it, there is an important segment of the transportation sector that has apparently ignored the warnings: the rental car industry. Christopher Jensen of the New York Times Automotive Blog has this report:
“In the petition filed with the F.T.C. , the two consumer groups and Ms. Houck said that Enterprise had no right to pick and choose recalls, that consumers needed to be protected and that all recalled vehicles should be parked until they were fixed.
Two of the victims of a failure by Enterprise to carry out a recall were the Houck sisters: Raechel, 24, and Jacqueline, 20. On Oct. 7, 2004, they were killed in Monterey County, Calif., after a fire broke out under the hood of their car and they collided with an 18-wheeler.
Their vehicle was a 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser, which had been recalled early in June because power steering fluid could leak and cause a fire in the engine compartment. That recall covered about 438,000 PT Cruisers from the 2001–5 model years.”
Although rental car companies are not bound by law (yet) to fix all of their recalled vehicles, it is a matter of public safety that regulations should be immediately instated to ensure the safety of the vehicles on the road. There have been too many instances where safety issues with cars were suppressed or ignored, as detailed in our occasional mini-series regarding car safety, and with the problems that Toyota experienced early in the year still fresh in the mind of all drivers, policy makers should recognized that safety is not privilege in our country, but rather an expectation that all companies, whether they be the car manufacturers or the rental car companies, provide products and services that are the fruit of the businesses’ best efforts to guarantee our safety when we get behind the wheel of a vehicle.
At PERENICH The Law Firm, we are proud to be part of the same Civil Justice System that has brought protection and peace of mind to every motorist on the roads in the country and here in Clearwater and the greater Tampa Bay area. As your personal injury and car accident lawyers, we will serve you in times when corporations willfully put you and your loved ones at risk, and through our combined efforts, help create a safer society for the rest of the nation as well.
Graduation and the Florida “Open House Party” Law
Tuesday, June 8th, 2010As the 2009-2010 school year winds to an end, we here at Perenich The Law Firm wish to congratulate all those students who are graduating. However, in the midst of your celebrating, it is advisable to follow Florida state law that prohibits adults from giving underage party-goers alcohol. The Florida “Open House Parties” law was written expressly to restrict minors from having parties and consuming alcohol under parental supervision.
If someone were to host a party where they did not take reasonable steps to prevent minors from obtaining alcohol, they could be subject to punishment up to 60 days in jail. However, we are more concerned with the consequences that may result from minors leaving such an open house party.
If you were to be hit by an inebriated minor who was given alcohol at someone’s party, the Florida law states that the responsible parents in charge of the party can be held liable for that minor’s actions. Giving alcohol to minors not only breaks the law, but places others in harm’s way. Although it may have been well-intentioned to “supervise” the drinking of minors, the cold fact is that it is legally wrong to provide the alcohol to the minors. Those who go ahead and serve minors alcohol anyway places you and your loved ones at risk.
If you or a loved one was involved in a car accident or some other incident stemming from a minor who was given alcohol, you may have the opportunity to seek recourse from the parents who illegally supplied the alcohol. At Perenich The Law Firm, helping to create a safer community is our top priority, and we can assist you in instances where someone’s negligent and illegal behavior hurts you or those you love. As your Clearwater and Tampa Bay personal injury lawyers, we can help you hold accountable those who willfully put you in harm’s way.
Car Safety Advances: The Dodge Monaco and Side Impact Safety
Tuesday, June 1st, 2010This is the Second part of an Occasional Series detailing advances in automobile safety through the Civil Justice System
With the recent controversy over defective parts in Toyota automobiles, we here at Perenich The Law Firm felt it may be in order to let you know instances in the past where personal injury lawyers and car accident lawyers in our profession helped bring about important changes in car safety that were not previously regulated by the government.
Officer Richard Dawson of the Pennsauken Police Department (N.J.) was responding to a burglar alarm in 1974 when he lost control of his Dodge Monaco. In the resulting skid, the side of his car struck an unyielding steel pole, and although statements from witnesses and bystanders said that it at less than 26 miles per hour, the pole smashed through the car and crushed Mr. Dawson. The resulting injuries left him quadriplegic and in need of medical care constantly for the rest of his life.
In a court case that followed, the personal injury attorneys for Mr. Dawson argued that the design for the Dodge Monaco was defective, as it was unable to withstand impacts from the side even at relatively low speeds. The frame of the vehicle was non-continuous, as there was a 17-inch gap between the front and rear frames of the vehicle. Later evidence from the accident showed that the pole had slid down the length of the car body until it reached this gap, and then it tore through the car, resulting in the catastrophic injuries to Mr. Dawson. A continuous frame would have prevented such disastrous results.
Chrysler, the maker of the Dodge Monaco, claimed that it had no duty to make a “crash-proof” car, and indeed at the time, had followed all existing prescribed regulations. Such a frame, they said, would add $300 to the cost of the car, but the court disagreed and Chrysler was held responsible for the defective design. Thanks to the personal injury attorneys of Mr. Dawson, car manufacturers now routinely build their cars with strong continuous unibody designs that protect us, their consumers.
At Perenich The Law Firm, we are proud to be part of the same Civil Justice System that has brought protection and peace of mind to every motorist on the roads in the country and here in Clearwater and the greater Tampa Bay area. As your personal injury and car accident lawyers, we will serve you in times when corporations willfully put you and your loved ones at risk, and through our combined efforts, help create a safer society for the rest of the nation as well.
Car Safety Advances: The Ford Pinto and the Gas Tank
Wednesday, May 19th, 2010This is the first installment of a new Occasional Series detailing advances in automobile safety through the Civil Justice System
With the recent controversy over defective parts in Toyota automobiles, we here at Perenich The Law Firm felt it may be in order to let you know instances in the past where personal injury lawyers and car accident lawyers in our profession helped bring about important changes in car safety that were not previously regulated by the government.
Many still remember the Ford Pinto from the 1970s and the legal issues that followed it. When designed, the gas tank was not placed above the rear axle (as was common at the time) but instead behind the rear axle. This placed it only 9 inches away from the axle, and left the tank extremely vulnerable to collisions from the rear.
In 1972, Lily Gray and thirteen year-old Richard Grimshaw were travelling in a 1972 Ford Pinto when they were struck by another car travelling 30 miles per hour, and upon impact, their car burst into flames, in which Lily Gray was killed and Richard Grimshaw suffered severe injuries.
Ford Motor Co. had known about the design defects prior to this accident, and had commissioned a cost/benefit analysis to see what its options were. They determined that for only $11 per car (a total of $137 million for all of their affected cars), they could fix this potentially deadly defect. But, using data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), they determined fixing these problems would result in a total of 180 less burn deaths, 180 less serious burn injuries, and 2,100 less burned vehicles. Using values from the NHTSA, the total “societal benefit” resulting from these changes would “only” amount to $49.5 million, and therefore it was not cost effective to proceed with the modifications.
Trial lawyers took Ford to civil court on behalf of the injured parties, but at the time, the fuel tank placement met all government standards. Technically, Ford had adhered to the regulations of the time. However, the courts found that Ford was indeed responsible to make a product that was free of preventable risks that could endanger individuals and society as a whole. The action brought through the Civil Justice System went on to spur new government standards that made cars safer for consumers.
At Perenich The Law Firm, we are proud to be part of the same Civil Justice System that has brought protection and peace of mind to every motorist on the roads in the country and here in Clearwater and the greater Tampa Bay area. As your personal injury and car accident lawyers, we will serve you in times when corporations willfully put you and your loved ones at risk, and through our combined efforts, help create a safer society for the rest of the nation as well.
Auto Insurance Advice That Will Protect You and Save You Money
Wednesday, May 12th, 2010At Perenich The Law Firm, we often deal with car-accident claims that are exacerbated by lapses in insurance. Here are a few tips that we and Jonathan Berr at WalletPop.com have put together to help you cover yourself and save money:
- Protect yourself with Uninsured Motorist coverage to cover yourself when someone else is at fault. Many of our cases here at Perenich The Law Firm deal with at-fault drivers who have no insurance or insufficient insurance to cover the injuries their victims sustain. With a down economy, the percentage of uninsured or under-covered drivers on the road has increased, and could leave you vulnerable. Further information on the Florida No-Fault policy and the different types of insurance available to protect yourself can be found here.
- If your commuting habits have changed due to a job loss, call your insurer immediately if you are putting less miles on your car, and your rates could be lowered.
- If you are driving an older car, watch your deductibles, as they may cost you as much to insure your vehicle as its actual worth.
- Skimping on the coverage you purchase can hurt you later, as accident costs can add up quickly.
Auto Accidents are frustrating events, and here at Perenich The Law Firm, we hope that people drive responsibly and distraction-free. However, if a negligent driver causes you to be involved in an auto accident, we are here to serve as your Tampa Bay Auto Accident Lawyers and to ease that frustration and help recover the costs from the at-fault driver’s insurance company, or in certain cases, pursue a lawsuit on behalf of our clients to hold the responsible party accountable for causing their injuries.
Toyota Accelerator Cover-up Exposed
Tuesday, April 20th, 2010Toyota’s failure to own up to mechanical defects in its automobiles has cost lives that otherwise could have been saved. With new details emerging that Toyota sought to delay and cover up the mechanical problems with sticking accelerators in its popular line of automobiles, including the best selling Camry model, the questions now remain as to what did Toyota know and when did they know it. As reported on Bloomberg.com:
Irv Miller, then a vice president for Toyota’s U.S. sales unit, told other officials in an e-mail on Jan. 16 that “the time to hide on this one is over.” The world’s largest automaker recalled 2.3 million vehicles in the U.S. for accelerator pedal flaws the following week.
“We are not protecting our customers by keeping this quiet,” Miller wrote in an e-mail to Toyota executives in the U.S. and Japan, obtained on April 8, 2010.
American consumers have an expectation of safety when they purchase an automobile and that expectation has never been higher than with the Toyota brand of automobiles. Unfortunately Toyota may never be able to regain that level of trust after more facts have been uncovered about their own knowledge of product defects. Throughout Florida and the entire United States, many families have come to suffer the loss of loved ones because of this unfortunate denial of defects in the manufacture of these high end products. In fact, many people are taking a second look at automobile accidents involving Toyota Camrys to determine if the actual cause of the automobile crashes is the result of the defective accelerators.
As the story of the Toyota accelerator continues to develop, many foresee the American civil justice system as the last defense against these types of anti-consumer practices. At Perenich The Law Firm, we handle cases such as major product liability actions throughout the Tampa Bar area.







