Archive for the ‘Auto Accidents’ Category

Florida House Subcommittee Passes PIP Reform Bill

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

The Florida House Civil Justice Subcommittee voted to pass CS/HB119 on Wednesday afternoon, moving Florida lawmakers one step closer to radically altering the rights of Florida residents who are involved in auto and other motor vehicle accidents. The bill is aimed at overhauling Florida drivers’ Personal Injury Protection insurance, also known as “PIP” or “no-fault insurance.”PIP reform insurance

Under the current law, every Florida auto insurance policy must include a minimum of $10,000 in PIP medical insurance coverage per person per accident.  The PIP benefits must be used to cover the driver’s (and passenger’s) medical bills first, regardless of whether or not the driver was at fault in the auto accident.

By contrast, the proposed House bill, which would go into effect on October 1, 2012 if passed, would impose an emergency care system, requiring drivers involved in auto accidents to receive emergency room treatment within 72 hours of the accident for their injuries.  Only those (a) transported by ambulance; (b) treated in a hospital by an MD, DO, dentist, ARNP or PA; or (c) admitted to the hospital would be eligible for the $10,000 in benefits.  The bill would not allow treatment by a chiropractor or licensed massage therapist.

Even supporters of this proposed legislation agree that such a drastic requirement would increase health care costs and further burden ER hospital staff who are already overwhelmed, not to mention it would also endanger the health of other ER patients by creating greater delays in treatment.  Moreover, those who suffer traumatic brain injuries and other forms of injuries frequently sustained in auto accidents may not develop symptoms of such serious, potentially life-threatening injuries for months or even years.  Further, the bill ignores the proven medical benefits of prompt chiropractic treatment in auto accident victims.

HB 119 would also impose numerous additional requirements for accident reports, provide coverage limits, establish a schedule of maximum charges, create a list of diagnostic tests deemed not to be medically necessary, and control attorneys’ fees.  It would also allow expanded “examinations under oath” by insurance companies, which are already intimidating and intrusive to auto insurance policy holders.  Florida Governor Rick Scott expressed his support for the bill at a news conference yesterday.

The bill is currently before the House Economic Affairs Committee.  Meanwhile, the Florida Senate also has its own version of a PIP reform bill, SB1860, which does not cap attorneys’ fees but requires long-form accident reports and additional licensing of clinics to address fraud, along with calling for a statewide task force.

Florida lawmakers’ stated rationale for imposing such radical no-fault insurance reform is to curb insurance fraud throughout the state.  It is unclear, however, how the measures proposed in the House and Senate bills would reduce fraudulent claims.  What’s worse, unless the legislation considers the potentially disastrous consequences of radical PIP reform and blindly acquiesces to mounting pressures by insurance lobbyists, the new law will leave thousands of Florida drivers with serious injuries–many of whom already lack health insurance–in the dust.

The attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have over 70 years of combined experience in settling auto and other accident cases, together with the resources to take a case through trial and a jury verdict in the appropriate circumstances. We have tried dozens of cases throughout Florida, including Pinellas, Hillsborough, and Pasco Counties, and you can count on us to fight to resolve your case for what it’s worth.

Florida Jury Awards Motorcyclist $38M

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

A jury in Palm Beach County, Florida recently awarded a motorcyclist $38 million for injuries and damages sustained in a motor vehicle accident.  Timo Nummela suffered pelvis and leg fractures as well as severed fingers when his motorcycle was struck by a vehicle.  Nummela and the other driver’s views were allegedly obstructed by overgrown bushes.  Additionally, the other driver ran through a stop sign, according to witnesses.

Nummela settled with the owner of the property for negligently maintaining its premises and obstructing visibility on the roadway and intersection.  He then proceeded to trial against the other driver.

The attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have over 70 years of combined experience in settling auto and other accident cases, together with the resources to take a case through trial and a jury verdict in the appropriate circumstances. We have tried dozens of cases throughout Florida, including Pinellas, Hillsborough, and Pasco Counties, and you can count on us to fight to resolve your case for what it’s worth.

Florida’s New Pill Mill Law may be Difficult to Swallow

Wednesday, August 17th, 2011

Sometimes, the best-intended laws have unanticipated consequences.  Consider Florida’s new legislation aimed at grinding down prescription drug abuse, which is responsible for the deaths of 7 Floridians every day on average, according to the St. Petersburg Times.  Last year, then-governor Charlie Crist also approved legislation imposing stricter regulation on doctors and pain management clinics in Florida that prescribe and dispense prescription pain medication.

The new “Pill Mill Law” signed by current Florida governor Rick Scott, which went into effect on July 1, 2011, “tightens reporting requirements to the database from 15 days to seven days, a change critics said the program needed to make it more effective.”  In addition, the new prescription drug law “increases penalties for overprescribing Oxycodone and other narcotics, tracks wholesale distribution of some controlled substances, and provides $3 million to support law enforcement efforts and state prosecutors.”  Further, the legislation “prohibits most doctors who prescribe narcotics from dispensing them, requiring prescriptions to be filled at certain types of pharmacies.”

Rick Scott actually opposed the bill initially before having a change of heart.  The St. Pete Times reported that “of all the oxycodone that is dispensed by physicians in the United States, 85 percent is dispensed by Florida doctors.”

Despite the Pill Mill Law’s lofty intentions, it is not without its problems, and implementing this and previous pill mill laws is proving difficult.  For example, one of the law’s requirements was that prescriptions be written on special, counterfeit-proof pads.  This proved unduly burdensome for doctors who were unable to obtain the requisite prescription pads in time to assist patients who genuinely needed pain medication.

In addition, Florida government has been calling for the creation of a drug monitoring program since 2009, but this has yet to occur.  Finally, the new law and its predecessors have the effect of punishing those whom the laws are designed to protect through severe punishment of pharmaceutical drug offenses, which includes a minimum prison sentence of 3 years and $50,000 fines.

Frequently, persons injured in auto accidents, slip and fall, and other incidents have the misfortune of becoming addicted to painkillers as a result of their injuries, which are often caused by the negligence of others.  The accident and injury attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm can help clients receive the medical care they need from qualified doctors.

Good Faith/Bad Faith: Insurance Companies’ Settlement Responsibilities

Monday, June 6th, 2011

Under Florida law, the term “negligence” refers to an array of legal theories under which private parties may sue for injuries and monetary damages resulting from automobile, motorcycle, ATV, and boating accidents, slip and fall accidents, and wrongful death resulting from an accident or medical malpractice, among others.

Typically, the insurance company for the party who caused the accident and resulting injuries handles the claim. If the insurance company does not offer to settle for a reasonable amount, the attorney for the injured party may initiate a lawsuit. However, insurance companies are required by Florida law to attempt to settle injury claims in good faith.

In fact, the attorney for the injured party may initiate a separate lawsuit against the insurance company for its bad faith refusal to settle a case.  Recent attempts by the Florida legislature to set limits and impose higher restrictions on bad faith claims against insurance companies were thwarted earlier this year when HB 1187 stalled in the Florida House.

While the overwhelming majority of all civil lawsuits filed – around 98% – settle out of court, in some cases, it makes sense to go to trial and let the judge or jury decide. For example, in a case involving a client who suffered serious, permanent injuries in an auto accident, if the insurance company refuses to make a reasonable settlement offer, the case should proceed to trial so that we may try to maximize the client’s chances of a fair recovery instead of settling for a trivial amount.

The attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm have over 70 years of combined experience in settling auto and other accident cases, together with the resources to take a case through trial and a jury verdict in the appropriate circumstances. We have tried dozens of cases throughout Florida, including Pinellas, Hillsborough, and Pasco Counties, and you can count on us to fight to resolve your case for what it’s worth.

Despite Great Expectations, PIP Bill is Rejected by Florida Legislature

Thursday, April 28th, 2011

The Dickensian decline of two PIP bills pending before the Florida House on Monday marked the failed efforts of some Florida legislators to reform insurance personal injury protection (PIP).  HB 967 and HB 1411 and their Senate counterpart SB 1694, which were heavily backed by insurance companies, would have imposed significant obstacles for persons injured in auto accidents (and their attorneys) to recover PIP benefits.

According to the St. Petersburg Times, the proposed changes included the following:

  • Requiring injured claimants and anyone treating them to be examined under oath;
  • Mandating an examination by a doctor hired by the  insurance company;
  • Denying claims earlier if the claimant did not cooperate;
  • Sending claims to a panel of arbitrators instead of paying them;
  • Giving insurance companies more time to investigate claims;
  • Tying PIP reimbursement to Medicare rates; and
  • Limiting attorneys’ fees, thereby “reduc[ing] their incentive to take insurance cases.”

Click here for a complete summary of the bills.  On April 25, 2011, the House Subcommittee on Human Services voted down the bills 9 to 8.

According to the Florida House of Representatives’ Summary Analysis of the PIP reform bills, the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law (No-Fault Law) requires motorists to carry at least $10,000 of no-fault insurance, known as personal injury protection (PIP) coverage.  PIP provides payment of medical, surgical, funeral and disability benefits to the named insured and persons injured while in, or struck by, the insured motor vehicle without regard to fault. In return for assurance of payment of these benefits, the No-Fault Law places limitations on lawsuits for non-economic damages (pain and suffering).  PIP is designed to compensate individuals quickly and efficiently and reduce automobile insurance costs and litigation.

The injury and accident attorneys at PERENICH The Law Firm help those injured in motor vehicle accidents file PIP claims and recover benefits and other damages.

Recent Collision and Growing Roadway Congestion Renew Bicycle Safety Concerns

Tuesday, March 8th, 2011

Yesterday’s collision in Largo, Florida involving a sport utility vehicle (SUV) and a bicyclist has renewed concerns over bicycle safety and whether existing Florida traffic laws are adequate to protect cyclists traveling on the Tampa Bay area’s busy roadways.

John Angus Gladwin, 71, was critically injured when he was struck by a Toyota SUV driven by Robert L. Towner, who was attempting to pass Mr. Gladwin on Longwood Drive near Bryan Dairy Road.

Now that plans for a high-speed light rail in the Tampa Bay area have been scrapped by Florida Governor Rick Scott, congestion on I-275, I-75, and other major thoroughfares such as US 19 will continue to grow, increasing the risk of accidents and personal injuries involving motor vehicles and bicyclists.

The Florida Bicycle Association’s website contains useful information on Florida bicycle laws, safety, and other resources.

Supreme Court Rules That Federal Auto Safety Standards Do Not Bar State Court Lawsuits

Friday, February 25th, 2011

Despite its disappointing ruling on vaccine-related lawsuits earlier this week, the Supreme Court just decided another personal injury case that marks a significant victory for victims of negligently designed or manufactured automobiles.

In Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., a unanimous Court held that state tort remedies are not preempted by federal minimum safety standards.  The Court found that lower courts had expanded such preemption too far in barring state law remedies for dangerous products. 

In Williamson, the victim was killed in a head-on collision because the rear center seat in the minivan she was riding in only had a lap-type seat belt rather than the safer lap/shoulder belt.  The state trial court dismissed the family’s product liability lawsuit against Mazda on the ground that it was preempted by federal motor vehicle safety standards, which allowed automakers the option of installing lap or lap/shoulder belts in the non-window position.  After the state appeals court affirmed the trial court’s decision to dismiss the case, the Supreme Court held that the regulation at issue only established a “minimum standard” and allowed a “continued meaningful role for state tort law.”

This decision will have a significant effect on millions of drivers throughout the country, including Florida residents involved in auto accidents, because over a million vehicles with this type of lap belt are still on the road.  In addition, this decision will likely be used to limit preemption of other minimum federal safety standards in future state court product safety lawsuits.

Keyless Cars May be Fatal

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

This morning’s broadcast of the “Today” show provided a grim reminder of the potential health hazards and personal injury risks in cars with keyless ignitions.  The show discussed the recent deaths of two Florida residents and a New York man in the past year from carbon monoxide poisoning when their keyless ignition vehicles, including a 2008 Lexus, remained running in their garages.  A fourth person suffered permanent brain damage.  A personal injury lawsuit has been filed in the New York case against Toyota, which owns Lexus.  More…

Rental Car Companies Put Consumers at Risk

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

Over the years, we have seen a somewhat continuous stream of safety recalls regarding cars issued to the public. Most of the recalls come after many serious injuries have occurred, but are still important in eliminating the cause of potentially dangerous malfunctions within the car. Although for most consumers it is a logical reaction to bring in a car to be fixed if a recall is issued for it, there is an important segment of the transportation sector that has apparently ignored the warnings: the rental car industry. Christopher Jensen of the New York Times Automotive Blog has this report:

“In the petition filed with the F.T.C. , the two consumer groups and Ms. Houck said that Enterprise had no right to pick and choose recalls, that consumers needed to be protected and that all recalled vehicles should be parked until they were fixed.

Two of the victims of a failure by Enterprise to carry out a recall were the Houck sisters: Raechel, 24, and Jacqueline, 20. On Oct. 7, 2004, they were killed in Monterey County, Calif., after a fire broke out under the hood of their car and they collided with an 18-wheeler.

Their vehicle was a 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser, which had been recalled early in June because power steering fluid could leak and cause a fire in the engine compartment. That recall covered about 438,000 PT Cruisers from the 2001–5 model years.”

Although rental car companies are not bound by law (yet) to fix all of their recalled vehicles, it is a matter of public safety that regulations should be immediately instated to ensure the safety of the vehicles on the road. There have been too many instances where safety issues with cars were suppressed or ignored, as detailed in our occasional mini-series regarding car safety, and with the problems that Toyota experienced early in the year still fresh in the mind of all drivers, policy makers should recognized that safety is not privilege in our country, but rather an expectation that all companies, whether they be the car manufacturers or the rental car companies, provide products and services that are the fruit of the businesses’ best efforts to guarantee our safety when we get behind the wheel of a vehicle.

At PERENICH The Law Firm, we are proud to be part of the same Civil Justice System that has brought protection and peace of mind to every motorist on the roads in the country and here in Clearwater and the greater Tampa Bay area. As your personal injury and car accident lawyers, we will serve you in times when corporations willfully put you and your loved ones at risk, and through our combined efforts, help create a safer society for the rest of the nation as well.

Graduation and the Florida “Open House Party” Law

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

As the 2009-2010 school year winds to an end, we here at Perenich The Law Firm wish to congratulate all those students who are graduating. However, in the midst of your celebrating, it is advisable to follow Florida state law that prohibits adults from giving underage party-goers alcohol. The Florida “Open House Parties” law was written expressly to restrict minors from having parties and consuming alcohol under parental supervision.

If someone were to host a party where they did not take reasonable steps to prevent minors from obtaining alcohol, they could be subject to punishment up to 60 days in jail. However, we are more concerned with the consequences that may result from minors leaving such an open house party.

If you were to be hit by an inebriated minor who was given alcohol at someone’s party, the Florida law states that the responsible parents in charge of the party can be held liable for that minor’s actions. Giving alcohol to minors not only breaks the law, but places others in harm’s way. Although it may have been well-intentioned to “supervise” the drinking of minors, the cold fact is that it is legally wrong to provide the alcohol to the minors. Those who go ahead and serve minors alcohol anyway places you and your loved ones at risk.

If you or a loved one was involved in a car accident or some other incident stemming from a minor who was given alcohol, you may have the opportunity to seek recourse from the parents who illegally supplied the alcohol. At Perenich The Law Firm, helping to create a safer community is our top priority, and we can assist you in instances where someone’s negligent and illegal behavior hurts you or those you love. As your Clearwater and Tampa Bay personal injury lawyers, we can help you hold accountable those who willfully put you in harm’s way.